Most people start with the Readiness Check. It’s a short direct conversation with Mikael. We look at where follow up is slipping, where handoff gets messy, whether LinkedIn-first outbound is the right lane, and whether a Pulse Check makes sense.
If you’d rather send context first, that’s fine. A few plain lines is enough. If you want to stay at a distance first, LinkedIn is the lightest route.
Mikael Lindback
Founder of GoPartnering. Works with founder-led and lean B2B teams that want a cleaner commercial system and a lead engine they can keep running.
That came from the EverCert work. The broader case also points to stronger warm lead flow and a system the client could keep using.
Keep it simple. Direct call, short written context, or a lighter LinkedIn follow first.
Best when you want a direct read on whether there’s a fit and where the real friction sits.
Useful if a colleague needs to see it first, or if writing is easier than booking straight away.
If you want to see how Mikael frames the work before you reach out.
Readiness Check first. Pulse Check if the issue is real. Then the 90 day sprint when the groundwork is clear enough to build.
A short first conversation. Direct. Useful. Not a pitch. Not a drawn out discovery session.
Used to see whether the fit is real and whether the next step should be a Pulse Check.
A deeper working session when the problem is real and worth fixing now. This is where the picture gets sharper.
Buyer direction. Message. Follow up. Booking logic. Handoff. Where the real friction lives.
The build itself. LinkedIn-first lead engine work with practical handover. Done with you. Not built to keep you dependent.
One main lane. Clearer movement. Something the team can actually keep running.
Not every Readiness Check leads to a Pulse Check. Not every Pulse Check leads to a sprint. Sometimes the right outcome is simply a clearer read on what needs fixing first.
No sales queue. No awkward handoff. It stays close to the work.
Whether you book or send a note first, the first look is direct. Not passed around.
If there’s a fit, the next step is clear. If there isn’t, that will be said plainly too.
That may mean a Pulse Check. It may mean waiting. It may mean fixing something simpler first.
GoPartnering tends to fit best when too much of the pipeline still depends on one or two people, follow up is uneven, or marketing, sales, and handoff are not pulling in the same direction.
The current sprint is built around LinkedIn as the main source. That keeps the lane clear and the handover usable.
Very early offers with no clear buyer yet. Pure B2C volume plays. Teams expecting every channel at once before one lane is proven.
A short outline is enough. What is not working. Where the pipeline feels loose. What you want to improve.
This goes to Mikael directly. You do not need to have the scope, budget, or full answer worked out before sending a note.
Book the Readiness Check. It is the cleanest way to see whether there is a real fit, whether a Pulse Check is the next step, and whether LinkedIn-first work is the right lane for your team.
If writing first is easier, use the contact form above.
We use cookies to improve your experience on our site. By using our site, you consent to cookies.
Manage your cookie preferences below:
Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the proper function of the website.
These cookies are needed for adding comments on this website.
Google reCAPTCHA helps protect websites from spam and abuse by verifying user interactions through challenges.
Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us understand how visitors use our website.
Google Analytics is a powerful tool that tracks and analyzes website traffic for informed marketing decisions.
Service URL: policies.google.com (opens in a new window)